Members Survey Findings

The responses to questions in the survey used the scale set out below.  The analytical tables show how many Members gave a particular response to each question.

Reporting to committee - There is clear agreement among Members that the quality of committee papers is good and continues to improve.

There was a common view among Members that there could be a greater focus in papers on equality, human rights and/or community impacts.

Priorities and progress - There is clear agreement among Members that the work of the Committee has a strong strategic focus, and is effectively tracking and following up on actions and their impact. 

Members and overall operation - All Members agreed that they are confident, agree positions, provide genuine challenge, seek assurances, and have the right balance of skills, knowledge and experience.

Governance Support and Remit - Members all agree that the Committee receives appropriate advice on taking certain agenda items in private, that minutes of meetings are of a high standard, and that the Committee’s remit is fit for purpose.

Terms of Reference - All five Members indicated that the Committee is fully discharging its responsibilities in line with its terms of reference.

Overall, the results for the Forensic Services Committee are extremely positive, with very few areas of concern being raised, or areas for improvement identified.

Two areas where consideration might be given for improvement:

• Committee papers to take greater account of implications and impact regarding equalities, human rights and/or community wellbeing; and
• Slippage in implementing actions is quite common, although it is recognised that an effective action tracking mechanism is in place.